screen |skr_n| |skrin| |skri_n| noun • a blank, typically white or silver surface on which a photographic image is projected : the world's largest movie screen • movies or television; the motion-picture industry : she's a star of the stage as well as the screen. verb [ trans. ] • protect (someone) from something dangerous or unpleasant • evaluate or analyze (something) for its suitability for a particular purpose or application
Friday, January 03, 2014
The Wolf of Wall Street
Jordan Belfort is a scumbag. Wolf of Wall Street gleefully shows us this in the opening 90 seconds of the
three-hour saga, skillfully establishing the tone and the general dicky-ness of
said scumbag protagonist. Scorsese and DiCaprio remind us, in case we forgot,
that Wall Street criminals are as bad, if not worse, than Mafia criminals. Wolf
of Wall Street feels a lot like a white-collar version of Goodfellas or Casino,
but instead of “goombas” whacking guys in dark alleys, the killing is being
made in the daylight, over the phone, and on the trading floor, and all of the participants
seem willing. Outrage over the sexuality here seems misplaced. Yes, there’s
plenty of nudity, but all the sex scenes are between consenting adults and its
nothing we haven’t seen on HBO or Showtime. Besides! What about the dwarf tossing? Where’s the
outrage for that? I don’t understand why people would
reserve their outrage for a movie with sex scenes in it, versus the real screw
job perpetrated by the Wall Street swindlers. Scor-Caprio™ delivers the movie
the Wall Street criminals deserve: a total indictment of stock market greed and
American over-consumption. They never stand on a soapbox and pass judgment on
their anti-heroes, but depiction is not endorsement, either. Instead, they force us to examine who we are as a culture (see
also: Spring Breakers) and to ask ourselves why would THIS be a way of life that
Americans should aspire to have?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment